How Does the Singaporean Style of Multiculturalism Differ from the European-Union Style?

While the concept of multiculturalism involves managing diversity and ensuring inclusion, the implementation of this principle varies significantly across countries. This article delves into the differences between the Singaporean and European-Union (EU) approaches to multiculturalism, focusing particularly on the historical context and enforcement of social cohesion.

Understanding Multiculturalism

Multiculturalism is a multifaceted concept that encompasses both the acknowledgment and acceptance of diversity in everyday life, along with the sharing of power and resources. It involves creating an environment where different cultural, ethnic, and religious groups can coexist harmoniously while maintaining their distinct identities. However, in practice, these goals can be challenging to achieve, as often seen in Singapore and the EU.

Historical Roots and Context

Singapore: The multicultural landscape in Singapore is uniquely shaped by its history. Unlike other multicultural societies, Singapore's ethnic diversity is largely due to the influx of immigrants from various parts of the world. The British controlled political power and allocated resources, while the Japanese occupation during World War II affected all communities. However, the shared goal of independence brought these different groups together under a common narrative of unity and progress. This historical context has led to a distinct approach to multiculturalism in Singapore.

Europe: In contrast, the EU's multiculturalism faces different challenges. The presence of established classes and new immigrant groups leads to debates over resource allocation and power sharing. The concerns of the poorest segments of society can escalate tensions, making the issue of cultural integration increasingly complex. The EU's historical background involves the reception of refugees and immigrants over centuries, leading to a more nuanced approach to multiculturalism.

Stricter Enforcement in Singapore

While both Singapore and the EU strive for integration, the enforcement of social norms and communal harmony differs significantly. In Singapore, the emphasis is on maintaining a cohesive society through strict enforcement of laws and social norms. Living space in Singapore is limited, with over 83% of the population residing in public housing and over 97% in apartments. This close living arrangement necessitates strict adherence to rules, including zero-tolerance policies towards racial or religious slurs.

The small living quarters also amplify minor inconveniences, such as the early morning calls to prayer from mosques or the strong curry and blachan odors from neighboring flats. Given the high density of population and the already challenging living conditions, any behavior that could disrupt harmony is rigorously managed. This includes strict eviction policies for those who do not adhere to communal norms, such as being a bad neighbor or making derogatory comments about race or religion.

Future Implications

Given the significant differences in the historical and cultural contexts, it is pertinent to question whether Singapore would also face the same issues as the EU if the economic pie were to shrink. Would resource allocation become a divisive factor? Historically, Singapore has managed to maintain a high level of social cohesion through a combination of culture, historical context, and strict enforcement of societal norms. However, if the economic situation were to worsen, there is a possibility that current divisions could become more pronounced.

Conclusion

The approach to multiculturalism in Singapore and the EU is deeply rooted in their respective histories and present-day realities. While the EU faces complex challenges related to resource allocation and cultural integration, Singapore's multiculturalism is guided by a strong sense of unity and shared history. As both countries navigate the evolving landscape of global demographics, the similarities and differences in their approaches will continue to shape their societal structures and policies.

Despite these differences, both Singapore and the EU share a common goal of fostering a harmonious and inclusive society. Understanding these historical and cultural contexts will help policymakers and citizens alike in navigating the complexities of multiculturalism in the modern world.

Keywords: multiculturalism, Singapore, European Union, societal integration, cultural diversity