What Evidence Supports 9/11 Being an Inside Job?

The debate surrounding the events of September 11, 2001, has a variety of arguments and counterarguments. While many find support in the event's being an inside job, a primary piece of evidence often cited is the inability of the roof fires to cause the collapse of the buildings. Interestingly, some also argue that the damage to the lobbies being consistent with the collapse from above rather than the impact of a plane crash.

Supporters of the inside job theory point to the unusual and complex nature of the buildings' collapses. They often argue that the force required to cause such collapses, as evidenced by the FEMA Human Remains Recovery Team GPS maps, is far beyond what would be caused by a plane crash alone or even conventional explosives. This is a point often made without a detailed scientific understanding, but rather a simple and understandable assertion about gravity.

The Role of Gravity and Forces

One of the key arguments against the plane impact theory is the force at work upon the collapse. Critics point out that gravity alone cannot explain the observed phenomenon, and that the buildings collapsing from top to bottom, taking down parts of the structure and causing extensive damage to the lobbies and surrounding areas, suggests pre-planned demolition. The term 'flying debris' is often used to describe the uneven distribution of remains, which is not typically seen in natural disasters.

Unusual Debris Patterns and GPS Evidence

Emergency responders and recovery teams, such as FEMA’s Human Remains Recovery Team, used GPS maps to meticulously record the exact location of every body and body part found. The GPS data recorded a staggering 21,812 pieces of human remains covering a distance of 3,368 feet, which is equivalent to about 11 football fields. This detailed and extensive pattern of debris raises significant questions about the forces involved and challenges the simple explanation of plane impacts.

Another curious aspect is the distribution of how far the human remains were spread. The vast majority, as recorded in the GIS data, were found within the 3,368-foot radius. This spread is difficult to reconcile with a natural process, especially given gravity's effect. If the buildings collapsed due to roof fires and structural failure, the remains should have been pulled down by gravity, making the observed distribution highly improbable.

Key Evidence Against a Terrorist Attack

Proponents of the terrorist attack theory often cite the presence and impact of plane crashes as the primary cause of the building collapses. However, this explanation falls short when considering the specific nature of the collapses. The collapse of the World Trade Center towers was so complete that even the lobbies on lower floors were extensively damaged. This suggests that the damage was not isolated to the upper floors where the plane crashes occurred, but rather involved a planned demolition mechanism that took hold from the top.

The Force Required for Double Collapse

The argument continues by questioning the force required to cause the collapses. The gravity-driven collapse through a hole in the floor (as described in reports and videos) would not result in the window glasses being shattered, yet the windows were indeed shattered, providing a narrative that is difficult to reconcile with gravity alone. Similarly, the Faraday cages around the stairwells, preventing any electronic communications from working inside the building, are also points that have been debated and analyzed.

Additionally, the unusual path of the flying debris, which includes a spread of tiny fragments over a wide area, is not consistent with the impact of a plane crash followed by fires. The distribution of remains is more indicative of a carefully planned demolition or a device buried within the structure that caused the collapse from the top down. The many tiny fragments (dust-like in nature) scattered over a wide area is a powerful visual and physical evidence supporting the idea of an inside job, where the aim was to distribute the remains in a manner that would baffle investigators and observers alike.

Overall, the evidence suggesting 9/11 as an inside job includes the unusual distribution of debris, the detailed surface of the collapses, and the force required, all of which challenge the idea of plane impacts followed by fires. While these are debatable and some aspects remain subject to interpretation, they are compelling elements in a broader discussion of the 9/11 events.