Finding Comfort: Daoism or Confucianism—A Personal Perspective

When faced with the ancient philosophies of Daoism (Taoism) and Confucianism, which one feels more comfortable? In my own experience, Daoism resonates more with me. The core of Daoism focuses on living in harmony with the natural way (Dao), while Confucianism emphasizes a more structured and societal approach. These philosophies, while derived from similar roots, aim at different purposes and can't be directly compared.

Historical and Philosophical Background

The path of Daoism begins with the I Ching (Book of Changes), a collection of ancient oracular divination texts. Over time, this influenced the development of Confucianism, a framework for social organization. Confucianism later saw the rise of Buddhism, and eventually, Daoism took shape as a quasi-religion with its own monasteries, scriptures, and practices, closely modeled after the Buddhist tradition. Confucius borrowed the Eight Trigrams from the I Ching, interpreting them with human-centric perspectives, which faced criticism from early Daoists like Chuang Tzu.

Personal Amenability to Daoism and Confucianism

In my personal view, I resonate more with Daoism. This philosophy emphasizes the importance of breaking down societal structures in favor of a natural and spiritual existence. While Daoism does not oppose technological advancements, it warns against the dangers of materialism and prioritizing economic gains over spiritual wellbeing. The recent global pandemic has underscored the importance of individual spirituality, as it affects the entire nation. Today, we find ourselves in a position where Daoism might seem like a failed solution for many, given the extensive knowledge and infrastructure we've built.

On the other hand, Confucianism addresses the human virtues and relationships which are very relevant and accessible to people in the 21st century. In a social context, Confucianism offers a structured, ethical framework that could bring about positive societal changes. Although Daoism criticizes Confucianism for classifying humans into rigid societal systems, it was more relevant when people were less materialistic. Today, Confucianism offers a more practical and accessible alternative for global populations.

Differences and Suitability

Daoism requires a deep understanding and mindset to be truly appreciated. It is more suitable as a personal philosophy rather than a structured societal framework. The spiritual and nature-based approach of Daoism can be challenging for many to accept without profound personal cultivation. However, it is not my intention to force others to follow Daoism. For the general population, Confucianism provides a more comfortable and practical approach to societal harmony and ethical living.

Conclusion

In summary, while Daoism and Confucianism are both valuable philosophies, they serve different purposes and appeal to different mindsets. Daoism offers a spiritual path that often requires deep personal realization, making it more suitable as a personal guide. Confucianism, with its emphasis on virtues and relationships, offers a structured approach that is more applicable and accessible to a wider audience in the 21st century.

Keywords: Daoism, Confucianism, philosophy, personal approach, spiritual path