Introduction to Meghan Markle’s Speech and Royal Neutrality

Recently, there have been discussions about whether Meghan Markle, now the Duchess of Sussex, would have been able to deliver a speech advocating for the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement if she were still considered a working royal. This raises a critical question regarding the political neutrality required of the British Royal Family and the contemporary role of a member within the royal household.

The Role of the British Royal Family: Political Neutrality

The Royal Family is supposed to maintain a stance of political neutrality, foregoing political leanings and comments on political issues. Queen Elizabeth II, in particular, has always emphasized this principle during her reign.

However, Meghan Markle’s actions and stance on social issues clearly demonstrate a departure from the traditional political neutrality of the British royal family. Her public advocacy for BLM underscores her willingness to engage with contemporary societal issues, even if it conflicts with the conventional norms of the royal household.

Margaret’s Resignation and Her Role

Meghan Markle’s “resignation” from her status as a working royal was more about her personal choice to relocate to the United States with her husband, Prince Harry, rather than an official removal from the family. Despite this, her ability to make a significant political statement like her BLM speech highlights a fundamental change in the royal household’s stance on social issues.

Queen Elizabeth II, who has been a symbol of stability and often refrains from public commentary, has also shown consistent support for neutrality. Her silence during times of national and international turmoil, such as the World War II service histories of other family members, serves as a reflection of the expected behavior of the royal family.

The Royal Family’s Silence on BLM

The British Royal Family, under the leadership of Queen Elizabeth II, has maintained a silence on various events in the United States, especially those related to social justice movements. The Queen’s lack of public statements on issues like the BLM movement and the death of George Floyd, despite her immense influence, highlights the importance of maintaining the perceived neutrality of the royal family.

The Argument for Meghan’s Speech

Despite the traditional protocol of the royal family being politically neutral, Meghan Markle’s speech was more of a personal and familial expression rather than an official royal stance. The Duchess of Sussex, who is a US citizen and resident in the United States, is entitled to express her opinions on issues she deeply cares about, even if they diverge from the traditional norms.

Prince William’s public comments on the lack of diversity in the film and TV industries further support the idea that members of the royal family can express their views on social issues, albeit in more formal or indirect ways. His open discussion of the need for change is a testament to the evolving role of the royal family in addressing societal issues.

Conclusion: A Duty to Speak

Ultimately, Meghan Markle’s BLM speech was not merely a personal choice but a reflection of her duty as a member of the royal family to use her platform for positive change. Her public advocacy for BLM demonstrates a shift in the royal family’s approach to social issues, one that allows for more open and public engagement with contemporary societal challenges.