Naming the Ottoman Empire in Northern Muslim States
Name Variations for the Ottoman Empire in Northern Muslim States
The Ottoman Empire, one of the greatest and most powerful Muslim states in history, was known by various names in different regions and languages. This article explores the terms used by the Sultanate of Morocco, the Mughal Empire, the Persian Empire, and other independent Muslim states to refer to the Ottoman territories.
Ottoman Empire
The most common name used for the Ottoman Empire in English and many European languages was "Ottoman Empire," derived from Osman I, the founder of the dynasty. This term reflected its vast influence and recognition as a major power in the Islamic world.
Devlet-i Aliyye and Dar al-Islam
Devlet-i Aliyye was a term used in some regions, particularly in the Persian Empire. It translates to "High State," denoting the high-ranking and influential nature of the Ottoman Empire. Another term, Dar al-Islam, meaning "Abode of Islam," was used to emphasize the Ottoman Empire's role as a Muslim ruling authority. This term reflected both the respect and the recognition of the Ottomans as protectors of the faith.
Sultanate
In some contexts, especially in regions like Persia and the Mughal Empire, the Ottomans were referred to simply as a sultanate. This term emphasized their role as a Muslim ruling authority but also highlighted their independent status as a separate sultanate rather than as an expansion of the Ottoman dynasty's control.
Turk and Al-Mamlakah al-Uthmaniyyah
Turk was a term used in Persian and Arabic contexts to refer to the Ottomans. It reflected both their ethnic Turkic origin and their influence over the Turkish-speaking territories. In Arabic, the empire was also known as Al-Mamlakah al-Uthmaniyyah, which translates to "The Ottoman Realm." These terms often carried political connotations and reflected the interplay between the Ottomans and other Muslim states.
Name Usage in Northern Muslim States
Specifically, in Persia and the Indian subcontinent, the Ottomans were referred to by distinct names that reflected their historical and political context. The term Osmani was commonly used to denote the Ottoman Empire in plural form and osman for the singular. This was true for most North Indian and Central Indian dialects because of the influence of Persian as a state language in these regions. The plural form Osmaniha also denoted the entire empire.
Rum and Kaiser
Another notable term was Rum, which was used in Persia and India to refer to the Ottoman Empire. This term, derived from the Greek "Rhomaioi," meant "Romans," and was used to designate people of Roman or Byzantine origin. The term was also applied to the Ottoman ruler as Kaiser. This usage highlighted the connection between the Ottoman Empire and the Byzantine legacy, emphasizing their shared religious and cultural ties within the Islamic world.
Historical Geographical Divisions
Geographical divisions such as Rum, Turan (Turkestan), and Hindustan were used to categorize regions within the broader Islamic world. The use of these terms reflected the political and social dynamics of the time, where the Ottoman Empire was perceived as a major power alongside other Muslim states.
Modern Names and National Identities
As modern nations emerged and national identities became more prominent, many of these historical terms fell out of use. Terms like Rum were gradually limited to specific regions, such as in Turkey, where it came to denote the Christian population and eventually the Greek community. This reflects the broader trend of modern national names replacing ancient geographical and historical references.
Historiographical Impact
Pre-modern historiography, which lacked the constraints of modern national identity, tended to use consistent categorizations. This made it easier to write a coherent history of the Islamic world, including regions like Persia, India, and the Ottoman Empire, which were seen as integral parts of a larger historical narrative. The use of terms like "kaiser" for the Ottoman emperor, which could be traced back to historical contacts such as the visit of the najashi (king of Abyssinia) to the 7th-century caliph, created a consistent and contiguous history across the Islamic world.
Today, while the world has seen a rise in nationalism and the assertion of unique national identities, the study of pre-modern history often relies on these older, more consistent categories to make sense of the broader scope of historical memory. Terms like Osman, Rum, and Kaiser serve as a reminder of the interconnectedness of the Islamic world in the past, even as modern national boundaries and identities have taken center stage.