Potential Prosecution of Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner: Insights into Tax Evasion and National Security Concerns

Recent discussions and investigations into the activities of prominent figures within the Trump administration have raised questions about potential legal implications, particularly in the realms of income tax evasion and national security. Interestingly, both Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner have become candidates for investigation due to their past actions and affiliations. This article explores the potential legal repercussions and examines the potential reasons behind these investigations.

Tax Evasion Allegations

There are significant allegations that Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner, along with their father, may have engaged in tax evasion. The core argument is based on their connections to Eastern European investments and their involvement in business deals with corrupt entities. One of the key points of contention is the Trump Tower meeting, which has been scrutinized for its potential violations of tax law and ethical norms.

In the 1980s, it is suggested that Jeffrey Epstein, who was initially involved with YELT SIN and later with the Trump organization, facilitated the sale of state properties to corrupt Russian globalists, many of whom are Putin supporters. This network extended to agreements such as the Trump Soho - Bayrock deals, where shell companies and financial institutions were set up to facilitate the laundering of funds. These operations are indicative of a broader pattern that has been observed in the Trump family's business dealings over the years.

Legal Analysis and Psychological Test

The psychological test conducted on Donald Trump Jr. has been pivotal in the ongoing investigation. It demonstrated that he possesses intelligence, suggesting that he knowingly or unknowingly participated in financial activities that may be illegal. The moral ambiguity of his actions lies in whether he was a mere patsy for Russian mobster partners or an active participant in these illegal schemes.

Critics argue that proving his knowledge of the activities is key. If he was truly unaware, he might be able to avoid charges under the RICO act and collusion with Russian business partners that could compromise national security and policy. Conversely, the psychological test suggests he was intelligent and aware of the implications. However, he has been feigning illiteracy and mental incapacity to argue his lack of knowledge.

National Security Concerns and Allegiances

National security concerns loom large in any investigation involving high-profile political figures. The argument that past actions should not influence current judgments often comes into play. Nihilists argue that actions from the past should not have consequences, as they do not hold value for the President of the United States. However, this view is countered by the belief that any form of compromise – such as greed, sexual scandals, or affiliations with potential adversaries – are unacceptable in the context of national security.

The state and federal governments, despite the objections of nihilists, will want to investigate not only current activities but also historical ones. The potential loyalty or disloyalty of individuals within the administration is a vital concern. Allegiances and business practices can trace back to their origins, making verification essential. Even if a person appears to be clean, the roots of their allegiances can be traced back through decades of business and personal connections.

Verification and Trust

The balance between trusting and verifying remains a challenge in these investigations. While some argue that the past should not influence current judgments, the government's obligation to ensure national security necessitates a thorough examination. Trust, however, cannot be blind. Verification processes are necessary to ensure that no conflicts of interest or security threats exist.

John Bolton has been a central figure in these discussions, bringing to light many of the alleged activities. His willingness to criticize and detail the YELT SIN affair and Russian connections has added fuel to the investigations. The Trump family, including Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner, will be under even greater scrutiny as long as these allegations persist.

Conclusion

The ongoing investigations into Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner highlight the complex interplay between national security, tax law, and ethical responsibility. Whether these individuals will face legal consequences remains to be seen, but the allegations underscore the need for a thorough examination of past and present actions. The balance between trust and verification will continue to be a critical issue in these cases, shaping the public and private perceptions of the Trump administration.