Should the Indonesian Government Seek the Return of Javanese Manuscript Serat Selarasa to Indonesia?

The question of whether the Indonesian government should request the return of the Javanese manuscript Serat Selarasa, taken by Raffles from the Yogyakarta Kraton and currently housed by the British Library in the United Kingdom, is complex and multifaceted. In this article, we will explore the historical, cultural, and practical considerations involved, ultimately concluding that it is in Indonesia's best interest to maintain the manuscript's current status while emphasizing the need for preservation efforts.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Manuscripts such as the Serat Selarasa hold immense cultural and historical value. They are not just pieces of paper but carriers of knowledge, traditions, and heritage. The Serat Selarasa, for instance, provides valuable insights into the historical and cultural context of Java, particularly the reign of King Hayam Wuruk and the Majapahit Kingdom.

Current Preservation Status

The current safeguarding of the Serat Selarasa by the British Library demonstrates its commitment to preserving such valuable documents. The manuscript has been carefully catalogued, studied, and made accessible to a global audience, contributing significantly to the understanding and appreciation of Indonesian history and culture. It is crucial to consider the advantages of its preservation in a well-resourced institution before proposing its return.

risks and Challenges

While it is understandable to desire the return of such treasures to their place of origin, returning the manuscript to Indonesia poses several risks. Historically, Indonesia has faced challenges in maintaining the safety and preservation of its own relics. There are concerns that the manuscript could be at risk of being stolen or damaged, especially during periods of political unrest or civil disturbances. The security and cultural institutions in Indonesia have shown improvements, but the potential risks remain.

Alternatives: Replicas and Collaborative Efforts

One viable alternative to full repatriation is the creation of high-quality replicas. The British Library, with its expertise and resources, could produce detailed replicas of the manuscript that could be displayed and studied in Indonesia. This approach would allow for continued research and public appreciation of the manuscript while mitigating the risks associated with its physical return.

International Co-operation and Research

Furthermore, fostering international cooperation and research can enhance the understanding and appreciation of these ancient texts. Collaborative efforts between Indonesian and international researchers can lead to shared knowledge and contributions to the field of Indonesian studies. This could include joint publication projects, seminars, and workshops that facilitate a better understanding and preservation of the manuscript's content.

Conclusion

While the sentiment to return the Serat Selarasa to Indonesia is understandable, it is crucial to balance historical sentiment with practical considerations. The current status of the manuscript at the British Library, where it is well-preserved and accessible to a global audience, offers significant benefits that should not be overlooked. Indonesia should strive to create a secure and culturally-resourced environment for preserving and studying its heritage. Requesting the full return of the manuscript at this juncture could be premature or potentially harmful. However, the Indonesian government could engage in dialogue with the British Library to explore alternative means of ensuring the protection and accessibility of the Serat Selarasa for future generations.