The Controversial Belief: Breeding Despite Inheritable Diseases

As a digital citizen and SEO expert, discussing controversial beliefs is an important aspect of contributing to informed conversations. One such belief that can generate significant debate is the practice of breeding despite knowing about inheritable diseases. I would like to share my personal perspective on this subject, as someone with a wealth of personal experience and knowledge.

Introduction to the Anti-Smack Law

It is concerning to see a societal shift where many young adults do not show any regard for anyone or anything. The Anti-Smack law introduced by Sue Bradley and Sheryl Savill is an example of a proposed legislation that reflects a growing frustration with parents and political figures who are perceived as neglecting their responsibilities.

Many young adults today act with a sense of entitlement, believing they can take whatever they want when they want without considering the consequences. This attitude is further perpetuated by the belief that parents lack the right to discipline their children. This approach to parenting may very well contribute to the rise of selfish, thoughtless behavior in the next generation.

The Ethical Argument Against Breeding with Inheritable Diseases

My stance on this issue is clear: if you have an inheritable disease, do not breed. The selfish act of bringing a child into the world with a life marked by diseases is not only morally wrong but also comes with profound emotional and practical consequences.

Living with inheritable diseases is a daily struggle for me, and the impact on the quality of life is significant. I have inherited diseases from both my parents, and the situation only gets worse with each passing year. Despite being in my thirties, the challenges are already considerable, and I use medications just to perform simple, everyday tasks that others can easily accomplish.

Witnessing the pain and sadness in my parents' eyes as they watched me grow up, envying and resenting healthy people, is not what a fulfilling life should be about. We should strive to prevent such suffering and promote a healthier future for our children and society as a whole.

The Future of Medical Cures and the Ethical Dilemma

Some argue that it is acceptable to breed individuals with inheritable diseases because a cure might be discovered in the future. However, we need to address this argument with a realistic outlook. As of 2024, more than 70 of the world's deadliest diseases do not have cures. Here are the key reasons why:

The medical industry may prioritize profitability over curing diseases, choosing to sell painkillers rather than researching and developing cures. Even if a cure is developed, it may still take decades to be available to the public due to extensive testing and regulatory approvals.

The notion that a cure will eventually be found is not a guarantee, especially considering the current state of medical research and the motivations of major pharmaceutical companies. It is our responsibility to consider the potential suffering and burden of living with a debilitating disease.

Conclusion

Parents have a profound obligation to consider the long-term impact of their decisions. Breeding with inheritable diseases is a decision with significant ethical, emotional, and practical consequences. It is crucial to take a stance that prioritizes the well-being of future generations and promotes a healthier, more inclusive society.

It is essential to engage in constructive discussions about these issues to foster understanding and make informed choices. By doing so, we can work towards a world where everyone can live a life free from the burdens of inheritable diseases.