The Origin and Evolution of 'The Right Side of History'

The phrase 'the right side of history' has been used and redefined over the centuries to reflect changing political and philosophical viewpoints. Its earliest recorded use can be traced back to a period of political and religious tension, as we explore its origins and transformation through time.

Origins and Early Use

Jacques-Benigne Bossuet, a prominent French theologian and statesman, coined the phrase 'the right side of history' in his defense of the divine right of kings in 1681. This context was pragmatic and backward-looking, emphasizing the conservative aspect of maintaining traditional authority and status quo. However, the phrase was not originally intended to describe a morally progressive stance. Rather, in asserting the divine right of kings, Bossuet claimed that both the Pope and the kings were divinely appointed, a viewpoint that, counter-intuitively, had progressive undertones by democratizing the notion of divine authority.

Contemporary Relevance and Misinterpretations

Over the years, the phrase 'the right side of history' has adopted new connotations, reflecting the dynamics of political and moral debates. Today, the phrase has evolved to signify the morally and intellectually superior view of history, often associated with progress and democracy. However, its usage has also been subject to misinterpretation and misuse, as seen in the case of Benjamin (Ben) Shapiro, an American conservative thinker. In his influential book of the same title, Shapiro argued that reason and moral purpose, embodying what he termed the 'right side' of history, were essential to the greatness of the West. He warned that an overemphasis on 'woke' and identity politics would jeopardize this moral and intellectual foundation, leading to potential societal destruction.

Modern Usage and Influence

Shapiro's book and the phrase 'the right side of history' have gained significant traction in contemporary political discourse, often cited by political figures and analysts. Notably, the phrase has been used to critique former U.S. President Barack Obama, who has been blamed for the rise of the proto-fascist Tea Party movement, which later propelled Donald Trump to power. The implication is that Obama, through his policies and rhetoric, steered the nation towards an 'incorrect' or 'wrong' side of history.

Conclusion

The evolution of 'the right side of history' from a religious and conservative defense to a philosophical and political critique underscores the dynamic nature of historical interpretation. As political ideologies and societal values continue to shift, the phrase will undoubtedly continue to evolve, reflecting new debates and conflicts. Whether one aligns with the 'right' or 'wrong' side of history, the discourse remains a crucial aspect of understanding and shaping our collective future.