The Royal Family Scandal: Unaccountability and Media Scrutiny
The Royal Family Scandal: Unaccountability and Media Scrutiny
In recent times, Meghan Markle and her husband, Prince Harry, have faced significant media scrutiny and criticism. Though this attention is often seen as unfairly harsh, it is important to compare their situation with that of other Royal Family members to determine if there is a pattern of unaccountability.
Why Meghan Markle?
Meghan Markle, also known as Meghan Duchess of Sussex, is frequently criticized for her perceived arrogance and perfectionism. She is often accused of being overly concerned with her public image and being somewhat sheltered from the realities of the Royal living quarters.
Media Tactics and Labeling
While Meghan Markle is often referred to as a 'PR troll,' other members of the Royal family have also faced harsh media scrutiny. For example, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, has endured intense criticism on social media platforms such as Quora. Her relationship with Charles, Prince of Wales, has also faced significant public debate.
Catherine, Princess of Wales, has also experienced substantial media attention. Throughout her tenure, she has often been subject to criticisms and media mobbing. Despite the media's efforts, Catherine's name is still well-known, and she continues to receive criticism from various media outlets.
Examples of Unaccountable Members
It is not only Meghan Markle who has faced media scrutiny; several other members of the Royal family have also struggled with unaccountability.
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew, Duke of York, has faced significant criticism over the years. While some of it may be justified, the level of scrutiny he has faced often seems to be disproportionate to his actions. The media in the USA has been particularly harsh towards him, while leaders such as Bill Gates, former President Clinton, and President Trump, who have faced similar accusations, have not faced the same level of scrutiny.
Prince Edward
Prince Edward, Earl of Strathearn, has also faced criticism, although not as prominently as some other members of the Royal family. His contributions and public service have often been overshadowed by more negative media attention.
Patronage and Criticism
Members of the family, like Prince Philip, have also faced significant media attention over the years. His frequent 'gaffes' and remarks in public have often been scrutinized and made into a cause for concern by the media. Similarly, Princess Michael of Kent has faced intense media scrutiny in the past, though it has since slowed down significantly.
Is Meghan Markle's Scrutiny Unfair?
While it is true that Meghan Markle has received substantial media attention, it is important to consider whether this attention is entirely disproportionate to that of other Royal Family members. In fact, several members have faced long-term scrutiny, with Camilla and Charles enduring decades of negative media attention. Catherine, too, continues to face significant criticism.
The nature of the media attention experienced by Meghan Markle during her first four years of marriage to Harry is often compared to that of other Royals. The UK media, in the beginning, was largely positive towards her, and even Oprah Winfrey had to rely on US media to provide examples of negative coverage, which were often exaggerated and unfair.
Moreover, US media often accuses Meghan and Harry of various offenses, including threats to their lives, which is something that would not have occurred in the UK. However, it is crucial to remember that the freedom of speech in the USA means that this can be endured. The UK media, on the other hand, tends to be more cautious and less prone to using potentially defamatory statements.
Conclusion
While Meghan Markle and Harry have certainly faced media scrutiny, the extent of this attention is not entirely unique or unfairly harsh. Other members of the Royal Family have endured similar levels of criticism over longer periods. The scrutiny Meghan Markle has received is often a combination of media attention both in the UK and the USA. While some of this may be justified, it is important to compare the levels of scrutiny faced by different members of the Royal family to understand the broader context.