The Truth About Kshatriyas, Brahmins, and Untouchability

In the annals of Indian history, the relationship between Kshatriyas and Brahmins has been a topic of much discussion. Historically, no time existed where Kshatriyas were seen as untouchables by Brahmins. This concept of untouchability is a misconception perpetuated by the followers of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, used as a tool to castigate Brahmins unjustly.

Brahmins and the Kings

During the ancient times, Kshatriyas, who were kings, played a significant role in protecting the Brahmin community from enemies. They provided them land, money, and basic necessities, all geared toward the welfare of the people. Kings often sought the advice of Brahmins, who were revered as Rishis, to guide them on the prosperities of their realms. Brahmins were instrumental in teaching the art of warfare to the kings, enabling them to defend their kingdoms from external threats.

The Role and Lifestyle of Brahmins

Brahmins were not just revered as teachers and philosophers, but also as custodians of dharma (ethics and duties). The concept of ‘purity’ was central to their way of life, making it challenging for other castes to comprehend. Brahmins strictly adhered to a vegetarian diet, viewing it as a fundamental duty rather than a choice. Other caste members, particularly meat-eaters, found it difficult to reconcile this lifestyle with their eating habits.

Temple Purity and Untouchability

There was a time when only Brahmins were allowed to enter temples, primarily due to their emphasis on purity. They believed that food offered to deities became prasad (food blessed by a deity) after a purification process. This practice was often misunderstood by the general populace, leading to the misconception of untouchability. However, this was not about untouchability but about maintaining the sanctity and purity of the temple environment.

The Misrepresentation of Brahminism

The practice of not allowing non-Vegetarians to enter temples was a way of ensuring that the sacred atmosphere of the temple was not compromised by impurity. This was not a caste-based exclusion but a rule for maintaining the sanctity of the place. The followers of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and certain political figures utilize this historical practice to spread misconceptions and foster political turmoil amongst different castes.

Respecting Brahmin Customs

Respect should be shown toward the lifestyle and customs of Brahmins, who follow a unique path of dharma. It is unjust and disrespectful to mock their dietary practices or their way of life. Brahmins followed strict rules, such as cleansing their legs upon returning from outside places. This ritual was a part of their daily routine and symbolized their commitment to purity and righteousness.

Conclusion

Understanding the historical context of Kshatriyas and Brahmins is crucial in debunking the myth of untouchability. The exclusion of non-vegetarians from temples was not a form of social discrimination but a measure to protect the sacred environment of these places. It is essential to promote respect and understanding of different cultural and religious practices to maintain social harmony and mutual respect.