The Truth Behind Vaccine Adverse Events: Why the Media is Silent

In the midst of the global pandemic, the relationship between pharmaceutical companies and the media has been under scrutiny. This piece delves into the reasons behind the underreporting of vaccine adverse events in the media, analyzes the data, and encourages readers to conduct their own research.

Why the Silence from the Media?

The editorial independence of media outlets is often compromised by financial interdependencies. Big pharma, a significant advertiser, wields considerable influence over media coverage. Consequently, negative reports about vaccines, which could potentially damage their financial interests, are seldom featured. This has led to a contentious issue: a massive coverup of vaccine injuries and deaths.

Do Vaccinated People Survive Better?

Contrary to popular belief, vaccinated individuals do not necessarily have a higher survival rate compared to the unvaccinated. In fact, the majority of people admitted to hospitals with Covid-19 symptoms in recent times are vaccinated. This striking trend suggests that vaccination may not be as protective as previously advertised. Moreover, unvaccinated individuals continue to live without suffering from conditions such as myocarditis, stroke, nerve damage, blood clots, or heart attacks, which are otherwise expected in vaccinated populations.

Personal Responsibility and Critical Thinking

As the saying goes, “When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.” In the context of vaccine coverage, the traditional media’s role as a hammer is evident. They often dismiss adverse events as exceptions rather than harbingers of danger. It is imperative for individuals to engage in their own research and critically evaluate the available data.

The Dangers of Unproven Vaccines

Little is known about the long-term health effects of the newly developed mRNA vaccines. Despite widespread use and alleged efficacy, potential risks remain unexplored. Experts from various fields, including doctors, PhDs, scientists, politicians, and virology experts, are urging caution due to the lack of long-term studies. The implications are profound, and the public deserves to be informed of the true risks.

False Claims and Misinformation

Some proponents of vaccines make misleading statements, such as suggesting that vaccinated individuals are protected against Covid-19 without serious side effects. For instance, claims that severe reactions are rare are often countered by citing individuals who had preexisting conditions and were not helped by vaccination.

FDA Approvals and Vaccine Safety

The FDA's approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty vaccine on August 23, 2021, marks a significant milestone in vaccine safety. This approval, combined with data from clinical trials, underscores the vaccine's safety and efficacy. However, the long-term effects are still unknown. The vaccine remains available under emergency use authorization (EUA) for individuals aged 12 and above and for third doses in immunocompromised individuals.

Government Mandates and Public Health

Government mandates, such as those in Florida and Texas, are highlighting the severity of the situation. These states, which have been vocal against mask-wearing and vaccination, are now struggling to manage a surge in hospitalizations. The United States has surpassed the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic in terms of deaths, emphasizing the urgency to address the pandemic through vaccination.

Conclusion: While vaccines offer potential benefits, the media's silence on adverse events calls for critical thinking and self-research. The decision to vaccinate must be a personal one, informed by the available data and individual health circumstances. Take control of your health and future by making an educated decision.