Understanding the Dilemma of Afghan and Pakistani Classification in the US Census

The term 'white' in the United States has had a fluid definition, influenced by social, legal, and political factors. This article aims to explore the nuances behind why Afghans are classified as white in the US census but not Indians and Pakistanis, drawing from historical and contemporary contexts.

Evolution of the White Classification in the US

The definition of 'white' has undergone significant changes since the US census was first conducted. Initially, the term was more rigidly associated with Western European ancestry. However, its boundaries have evolved over time, taking into account social and legal factors alongside personal identity.

White as a Political Construct

The concept of 'white' in the US often serves as a political tool, particularly beneficial for certain groups. For instance, the Federal Government's 8a program, aimed at providing preferential treatment to minorities, demonstrates how political classifications can result in varied racial categorizations. This example highlights the fluidity of such classifications and underscores the power of political influence in shaping definitions.

Discrepancies in Classification

Why are Afghans classified as white in the US census while Pakistanis and Indians are not? This question reveals the complexity of race and ethnicity in the US. The classification of Afghans as white may be due to factors such as geopolitical alliances, historical context, and national security interests. On the other hand, the non-classification of Pakistanis and Indians could be influenced by a desire to maintain their distinct cultural identities and political leverage within the US.

Photos and Perception

A visual representation of the Afghan Taliban leadership, as seen without filters, invites readers to judge their passability as a 'white' person. This illustration underscores the subjective nature of racial categorization and the inherent uncertainties that come with visual-based classifications.

Genetic and Historical Perspectives

From a genetic standpoint, the answer to why some Afghans might be classified as white is more complex than a simple racial designation. The presence of Red Caucasian DNA, which traces back to central Russia, and the broader genetic diversity in Afghanistan, provide a more nuanced understanding. Similarly, the genetic composition of Pakistan and India suggests a rich tapestry of human origins, including both White and Black DNA. This diversity challenges simplistic racial classifications and highlights the need for a more inclusive approach to understanding human genetics and ethnicity.

Personal Reflections and Implications

Some individuals are unconcerned with the classification of ethnic groups in the US census, citing their own cultural and personal identities. For example, the author of this piece suggests that the classification does not matter to them, particularly given their pride in their own identity as a person of colour. This viewpoint reflects a broader discussion on how one's own identity shapes their views on racial and ethnic classifications.

Conclusion

The classification of Afghans as white and Pakistanis and Indians as not white in the US census reflects the complex interplay of social, political, and historical factors. These classifications are neither permanent nor absolute, and they continue to evolve based on shifting social and political landscapes. Understanding these classifications requires a nuanced approach that considers both the genetic and cultural contexts of these groups.