Was Erwin Rommel a Good Guy or a Bad Guy: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

Erwin Rommel is one of the most debated figures of the Second World War. Commonly known as the Feldherr des Westens ('Field Marshal of the West'), Rommel was a distinguished general admired for his tactical acumen and leadership skills. However, he commanded different opinions regarding his personal beliefs, such as antisemitism and discrimination, and his loyalty towards Adolf Hitler. This article aims to explore the complexities of Rommel's character, providing insights into his actions and beliefs, and ultimately, whether he was truly a good guy or a bad guy.

Was Erwin Rommel a Good General?

It is widely acknowledged that Rommel was a master tactician and a skilled leader. His strategic prowess was evident in numerous battles, particularly in North Africa, where he orchestrated brilliant campaigns against the British forces under Bernard Montgomery. Romans, his popular memoir, narrates his experiences and provides a glimpse into his military strategies and personal life.

In the context of prisoner of war (POW) treatment, Rommel’s record is relatively positive. He was known to provide humane conditions for Allied prisoners, often going above and beyond the norms of the time. An example of his chivalrous nature can be found in his efforts to ensure decent treatment for POWs, even under harsh circumstances. This humane approach to prisoners contrasts with other German commanders, thus emphasizing his honorable conduct.

What Were Rommel’s Views on Antisemitism and Discrimination?

While Rommel was not active in the Nazi party and did not publicly propagate antisemitic ideologies, his personal views remain a subject of debate. Historical records show that Rommel, like many Germans, was ambivalent towards the Nazi’s antisemitic agenda. He did not actively support or oppose these policies, mainly because he was more concerned with overturning the humiliations faced by Germany post-World War I through the Treaty of Versailles.

However, it is reported that Rommel had a complex personal life, which included a relationship with a Jewish woman, Henriette Figermann. The existence of this relationship could be seen as a sign of his tolerance and resistance against the Nazi doctrines, even if it was not politically motivated. Despite this, Rommel was not immune to the prevailing societal pressures and may have contributed minimally to discriminatory practices without being a committed Nazi ideologue.

His Decision During the Plot Against Hitler

Rommel’s fate became closely tied to the plot against Hitler, known as the July 20 Plot. When he learned about the assassination attempt, Rommel had to choose between defending his reputation and protecting his family, or facing a trial that risked severe consequences. He chose to take his life to protect his loved ones, a decision that reflects his sense of responsibility and the moral dilemma he faced. This act, however, does not necessarily absolve him of his past actions and beliefs.

Conclusion

Erwin Rommel is a figure with many layers, making it difficult to categorize him as solely a 'good guy' or a 'bad guy.' As a general, he displayed tactical brilliance and humane treatment of POWs, but his support for the Nazi regime, albeit lukewarm, contributed to the broader context of the war. His decision to take his own life after learning about the assassination plot indicates his awareness of the moral wrongs of the regime. Historians and scholars continue to debate his legacy, and the answer to whether he was a good guy or a bad guy ultimately depends on one’s perspective.