Why Does White Privilege Exist But Other Things Like Straight Privilege, Cisgender Privilege, and Christian Privilege Don’t?

While the concept of privilege encompasses a wide array of identities and experiences, the color of one's skin is often the most immediately obvious and pronounced. However, some discussants argue that certain types of privilege are more recognized than others. The question “Why does white privilege exist, but other things like straight privilege, cisgender privilege, and Christian privilege don’t?” stems from varying degrees of visibility and acknowledgment. In this article, we explore the existence and significance of white privilege compared to other forms of privilege.

Intersectionality and the Visibility of White Privilege

One of the key arguments against the existence of white privilege is that it is often dismissed or denied by those who benefit from it. Critics argue that skin color is more prominently visible in social contexts than other factors like sexual orientation, religion, or gender identity. This visibility can lead to immediate and often unconscious assumptions and biases.

For example, the disproportionate number of Black people shot by police has often been linked to racial profiling and unconscious biases. These occurrences highlight the tangible impact of white privilege and the lived experiences that are not as apparent in discussions of other forms of privilege.

Denial and Resistance to Acknowledgment

There is a segment of the population that argues white privilege doesn’t exist. They view discussions about white privilege as a mechanism to make white individuals feel guilty. This resistance to acknowledging privilege is not limited to just one group of people but manifests across different social and political spectra. However, the reality is that privilege does exist, regardless of who acknowledges it.

Other forms of privilege, such as straight privilege, cisgender privilege, and Christian privilege, also play significant roles in society. Rich privilege, male privilege, able-bodied privilege, and neurotypical privilege are all recognized and acknowledged in various contexts. People who have these privileges rarely acknowledge that they benefit from them, much like those who have white privilege.

Protests and Social Movements

It is important to note that some forms of privilege, such as Christian privilege, are still recognized in certain contexts. For instance, there are more protests against mosques being built compared to Christian churches. This phenomenon suggests that the social and legal protections afforded to Christians, often rooted in religious freedom, are not always reciprocated in the same way by other religions or secular communities.

Despite these instances, the focus often remains on white privilege due to its widespread and systemic impact. The systemic nature of white privilege means that it is deeply entrenched in societal institutions, leading to persistent inequalities.

Addressing Privileges One at a Time

The argument that white privilege is dealt with first is rooted in the understanding that systemic issues cannot be tackled simultaneously. While it is essential to recognize and address various forms of privilege, the recognition of white privilege first is not a reflection of its superiority or more significant importance. It is more about facing the most prominent and widespread form of privilege first.

The journey towards equal rights and opportunities for all involves recognizing and addressing multiple forms of privilege. However, the starting point often begins with the acknowledgment and dismantling of white privilege.

In conclusion, the existence of white privilege and its persistent impact in society cannot be denied. While other forms of privilege are also significant, the visibility and systemic nature of white privilege demand immediate attention. The recognition of these privileges, both acknowledged and unacknowledged, is crucial in building a more equitable and just society.