Why No Royal Family Members Attended Archies Christening Ceremony
The absence of any royal family members from Archie's christening ceremony, despite the event being invitation-only and open to family and close friends, has sparked numerous speculations and controversies. This article delves into the reasons behind this notable absence and examines the significance of the event and the choices made by Archie's parents.
Why Were No Royal Family Members Present?
The absence of the royal family from the christening ceremony raises questions about the importance placed by Archie's parents, specifically Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, on this private event. Several factors contributed to this decision, including the choice of location and timing.
Private Chapel and Small Capacity
Archie's christening was held in the Queen's private chapel at Windsor Castle, a location that could only accommodate approximately 12 people. This decision to use a small, private chapel rather than the more traditional Chapel Royal at St James's Palace or St George's Chapel Windsor suggests a desire for a more intimate and personal event. However, the choice of this chapel also limits accessibility to the wider royal family.
Timing Conflict and Family Considerations
Another significant decision made by the royal couple was to schedule the christening on a Saturday, coinciding with the regular weekend time for William and Kate's family at their home in Norfolk. This timing choice likely aimed to minimize the disruption for William and Kate, who were expected to be at home over the weekend. However, it also meant that Harry and Meghan did not consider the scheduling of other family members and senior royals.
Calendar Conflicts
Further research reveals that the royal couple did not check the diaries of key family members and dignitaries, such as Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip, Prince Harry's aunts, Prince Charles, and Princess Royal, for their schedules on that day. It was discovered that Prince Philip had engagements elsewhere in the country, and Queen Elizabeth II was occupied with important business matters. Similarly, the Archbishop of Canterbury's office was not consulted, leading to the rescheduling of the Archbishop's intended participation in a Church of England meeting in York.
Conclusion
The decision to hold Archie's christening in a private chapel, on a date that did not align with the family's broader commitments, and with insufficient consideration of the availability of key royals and ecclesiastical officials, raises questions about the deliberate scheduling. This choice may indicate a desire for a smaller, more personal event, but it also highlights the importance of considering the broader family's schedules and commitments. The absence of the royal family from the ceremony does not necessarily imply a snub, but it does suggest a more pragmatic and personal approach to the event.