Why Trump’s Reaction to Greta Thunberg’s Person of the Year Choice Reveals Something More Than Jealousy

In the world of politics and media, reactions to recognitions can often reveal more about an individual than the award itself. Recently, Donald J. Trump's response to the choice of Greta Thunberg as Time's 2019 Person of the Year has sparked debate. This reaction goes beyond simple jealousy and speaks to deeper issues of political ego and the power dynamics at play.

The Context

Time's selection of Greta Thunberg as the 2019 Person of the Year was meant to highlight her influence and impact on climate change activism, particularly her ability to capture global attention through her speeches and protests. While many praised the choice, it also drew criticism from some quarters, including Trump. In his reaction, Trump expressed his displeasure with the selection, claiming that anyone with half a brain should know he, not Thunberg, deserved the honor.

The Argument for Trump’s Jealousy

On one level, it is clear that Trump's reaction can be seen as an act of jealousy. When the media and the public at large focus on Greta Thunberg, a young and unassuming individual, it shifts attention away from him. Trump has always been a man who craves attention and adoration. His actions and words are often designed to maintain and amplify his own visibility and fame. Thus, the choice of Thunberg as Person of the Year serves as a reminder of the diminishing relevance of his own public persona.

A prominent example of this was when Trump had a fake news cover made with his picture on it, imitating the style of Time’s magazine. When this story was reported, the White House initially downplayed it as a joke but later lost credibility. This incident highlights how Trump’s ego is connected to the narrative he creates and the control he seeks over his public image.

A Critique of the Selection Criteria

However, it would be shortsighted to dismiss Trump's reaction solely as jealousy. His defense of his own persona against a youthful activist also points to a broader critique of the selection criteria for the Person of the Year award. If the criteria were purely based on controversy and stirring up debate, then Trump’s selection would be valid.

The controversy around Thunberg, while often framed as a useful tool for discussion, may sometimes overshadow the underlying issues. Her activism is driven by a genuine concern for the environment and a direct action approach to raising awareness. Her impact on the global agenda and the subsequent discussion around climate change is undeniable. Thus, from a purely factual standpoint, her selection is justified.

The Broader Implications

Trump’s reaction to Greta Thunberg's Person of the Year title also serves as a larger commentary on political figures who dominate the media's narrative at the expense of more pressing issues. It raises questions about who gets to define and shape public discourse, and whether political leaders should be solely responsible for setting the agenda.

Beyond jealousy, the broader implications of Trump’s reaction suggest a need for a more ethical and balanced approach to recognizing societal leaders and voices. While controversy can often drive attention, it does not necessarily equate to making a positive impact on the world.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Donald Trump's reaction to Greta Thunberg's Person of the Year selection can be seen as an expression of jealousy and a symptom of his political ego, it also serves as a broader critique of the media's tendency to prioritize controversy over substance and a mainstream narrative that may not serve the greater good.

The impact of Thunberg's actions and the recognition she has received is clear, and her selection as Person of the Year is a reflection of the changing dynamics of public figure and activism. As we move forward, it is crucial to reflect on the criteria for recognizing individuals and ensure that such recognitions are meaningful and impactful.