Why Wild-Grown Marijuana is Considered Illegal Despite Legalization: A Closer Look

The phenomenon of wild-grown marijuana in states where its use is legal presents a complex and often misunderstood issue. Politicians and others with vested interests have concocted solutions to this so-called problem, capitalizing on a non-existent issue but generating substantial revenue and job opportunities instead. This article explores why wild marijuana is often kept illegal and what the real concerns are.

The Appearances of the "War on Drugs"

The 'War on Drugs,' which has been ongoing for over a century, is a prime example of how politicians can create a problem and then ostensibly solve it. The government, by declaring the existence of a drug problem, sets the stage for significant public support. People, especially those who are not well-informed, often believe whatever they are told by perceived authorities. This creates an environment where support for a political agenda can be easily garnered.

However, the apparent solutions to this 'problem' often enable the creation of lucrative industries. Jobs are created, and new products and grants are developed. The key is money; without substantial funding, these solutions would not exist. As a result, we see a cycle where the problem, once perceived, is perceived to be solved through financial means.

Wild Marijuana: An Unnecessary Problem?

Wild marijuana growing in the United States is often treated as an 'emergency' requiring attention, despite the lack of concrete evidence of its negative impacts. In reality, the concern is not about the plants themselves but about the potential risks that allow them to continue to flourish. Among these concerns are:

Black Market Concerns: Allowing wild marijuana to grow means larger quantities of unregulated and untaxed cannabis, which could enter the black market and evade government oversight.

Public Health Risk: Illegally grown marijuana could be of questionable quality, posing health risks to consumers. Regulation ensures that the production is safe and meets certain standards.

Economic Loss: Revenue from excise and sales taxes on legally grown and regulated cannabis is significant and goes towards public services and infrastructure. Without this, the government faces a financial gap.

Illicit Activity Sponsorship: Wild marijuana could fund criminal activities, potentially undermining law enforcement and the justice system.

Regulation and Taxation

It is important to understand that what is legal and regulated is not the same as benign. In the case of cannabis, the U.S. has adopted a regulatory framework similar to that governing alcoholic beverages. The biggest concerns revolve around the potential for unregulated production and distribution, which could lead to illegal market activities and a loss of tax revenue.

Allowing wild marijuana to grow freely could undermine the efforts of legalization and its benefits by creating a parallel, unregulated market. While there is no evidence that complete deregulation would solve this issue, it does highlight the importance of maintaining control through regulation. Legalization provides a mechanism for taxation and consumer safety, both of which are lacking in the black market.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the perceived need to eradicate wild-grown marijuana is driven more by concerns over the potential for the black market and the loss of tax revenue than by any direct harm caused by the plants themselves. The regulated market for cannabis in places where it is legal is a necessary safeguard against these issues, ensuring that production is safe and transparent.

As the debate around marijuana legalization continues, it is crucial to understand the real concerns behind efforts to regulate and tax the product. Wild marijuana, while not a problem per se, serves as a useful reminder of the importance of maintaining control over its production and distribution.